Monday, December 10, 2018

The coming super grand solar minimum

Big data means Fake Data or Weaponized data.

Try getting any data on any study or even your own data.

It is usually forbidden, hidden behind paywalls, or in complex formats that you cannot access.

Russia, Communist China, NSA, FBI, watch everything you do if you try to access any data or your own data.

The old book "how to lie with statistics" is out of date.

Now data is weaponized to deceive you, lie to you, or throw you in jail, or kill you

Soros, Obama, Zuckerberg, Google, health diet studies funded by government, climate studies funded by government, etc.

You get lies and they get the truth
 that they can use to enrich themselves, 
cement power relations,
 and harvest the dead bodies for their use.
Like cannibals.


BREAK OUT THE INSULATED COVERALLS... OR BETTER YET, MOVE WAY SOUTH.

JOHN


The coming super grand solar minimum


Zharkova was one of the few that correctly predicted solar cycle 24 would be weaker than cycle 23 — only 2 out of 150 models predicted this.

Her models have run at a 93% accuracy and her findings suggest a Super Grand Solar Minimum is on the cards beginning 2020 and running for 350-400 years.

The last time we had a little ice age only two magnetic fields of the sun went out of phase.

This time, all four magnetic fields are going out of phase.

It's time to stop worrying about global warming, and time to start worrying about global cooling. 

The problem with climate scientists is that they can't successfully predict temperatures in the future. 

This scientist, a solar physicist, has demonstrated the ability to predict the sun's behavior, and the tie in to the historical Maunder Minimum is scary.

Warming is easy to deal with.

 It helps plants grow and gives us more energy. 

Cooling is a much bigger challenge.

-----------------------

Dumb and Dumber!  Ignorance in government is rampant, but ignorance is bliss, I admit. 

Them that can, do and them that can't… administer.  
 
I just finished reading the "National Climate Assessment" to find it has no data at all, 

simply says it's the work of 13 agencies and it's based on a Representative Concentration Pathway adopted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) fifth Assessment Report (AR5) to make their conclusions

 -- No data or research, just re-hash the IPCC report and endorse it. 

In Critical Thinking, that is called "appeal to authority" – Dogma vs Data. Jerry Brown does it, same as the pope. 

It's what you do when you have no data, nothing, nada! 
 
Now I'm reading their SAI (Stratospheric Aerosol Injection) plan to launch SO2, sulfur dioxide (that's right!) into the stratosphere to cool us. 

There aren't any aircraft that can go high enough so we'll spend billions to make them. 

Funny thing is we spent the 70's ($$ MIT grant) on the decades long NAPAP, the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Plan. 

The EPA said that SO2 in the atmosphere mixed with rain gave, you guessed it, acid rain. 
 
We spent decades preventing SO2 entering the atmosphere so now we can spend zillions putting it back, kinda like we're doing with CO2 now and will reverse the process in a quarter century or so. 
 
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aae98d: 
 
(QUOTE)  This highlights another advantage of aircraft as a lofting platform, since they can take advantage of the onboard combustion system from S to SO2 explored by Smith et al (2018). Lofting S would cut in half the payload required compared with lofting SO2. Moreover, S is a less dangerous substance than SO2 to handle on the ground or contend with in the event of an accident. Other possible lofting methods such a balloons and guns could not accommodate this in situ conversion with existing technologies and would, therefore, need to loft SO2 with twice the mass of SAIL's payload.



No comments:

Post a Comment